Title
Bulakena Restaurant and Caterer vs. Court of Industrial Relations
Case
G.R. No. L-26796
Decision Date
May 25, 1972
Dismissal of six employees for refusing to disaffiliate from the union was ruled unlawful, underscoring the protection of employee rights against unfair labor practices.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-26796)

Facts:

  • The case involves Bulakena Restaurant & Caterer and Consuelo S. de Garcia as petitioners against the Court of Industrial Relations and the United Employees Welfare Association (UEWA) as respondents.
  • UEWA was organized among Bulakena Restaurant workers in January 1956.
  • On January 26, 1956, six union members formally affiliated with UEWA.
  • A grievance letter was sent to management on January 31, 1956, signed by over sixty employees, detailing various employment grievances.
  • The union's supreme head forwarded the grievance to Mrs. Consuelo S. de Garcia on February 14, 1956.
  • On April 11, 1956, the union filed a petition for a certification election.
  • From May 24 to August 24, 1956, the six complainants were dismissed one after another.
  • In November 1956, some complainants filed claims for illegal deductions and other benefits with the Department of Labor, most of which were dismissed.
  • The complainants testified that their dismissals were due to their refusal to disaffiliate from the union, a demand made by Mrs. Garcia.
  • The petitioners argued that the dismissals were justified due to employee infractions.
  • The Court of Industrial Relations found substantial evidence of unfair labor practices and ordered reinstatement with back wages.
  • The petitioners appealed the decision, claiming errors in the lower court's ruling.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Industrial Relations, ruling against the petitioners on all issues raised.
  • The court found substantial evidence supporting the claim of unfair labor practices....(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that certification proceedings are non-adversarial and do not conclusively determine employee status.
  • The court rejected the argument that the complainants lost their employee ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.