Case Digest (G.R. No. L-53431)
Facts:
The case involves the Board of Transportation (BOT) as the petitioner and the Greater Manila Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Association, Inc. as the respondent. The events leading to the case began on December 10, 1979, when Jose P. Dans, Jr., the Minister of Transportation and Communications, recommended the transfer of the BOT's offices from the Gutierrez-David Building in Quezon City to the Sandoval Building in Pasig, Metro Manila. The rationale for this recommendation was that the current location was shared with other offices, making it susceptible to the influence of fixers and unofficial personnel. Following this recommendation, the BOT commenced the transfer of its records.
On January 28, 1980, the private respondent filed a petition for prohibition and/or injunction with a request for a preliminary injunction to halt the transfer, arguing that it was illegal and would cause significant inconvenience to jeepney operators and drivers. The Executive ...
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-53431)
Facts:
Background of the Case
The Board of Transportation (BOT) sought to transfer its offices from the Gutierrez-David Building in Quezon City to the Sandoval Building in Pasig, Metro Manila. The Ministry of Transportation and Communications recommended this move to address issues such as accessibility to fixers, shared facilities, and security concerns.
Initial Actions
On January 28, 1980, the Greater Manila Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Association, Inc. (private respondent) filed a petition to prevent the transfer, arguing it was illegal, abusive, and detrimental to their interests. The same day, Judge Ernani Cruz Pano issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) halting the transfer.
Petitioner’s Arguments
BOT filed a motion to dismiss, stating that the transfer was necessary to curb fixers, ensure record security, and improve coordination with the Ministry of Transportation. They also emphasized that the President approved the transfer on February 19, 1980.
Respondent’s Claims
Private respondent argued that the transfer violated the Public Service Act, was financially disadvantageous, and caused unnecessary difficulties for their members. They also claimed the lease agreement for the Sandoval Building did not comply with LOI No. 767.
Lower Court’s Inaction
Judge Jose P. Castro failed to resolve BOT’s motion to lift the TRO and private respondent’s motion for a preliminary injunction, prompting BOT to file this petition before the Supreme Court.
Issue:
- Did respondent Judge Jose Castro commit grave abuse of discretion by failing to resolve the motions promptly?
- Was the transfer of BOT’s offices to Pasig lawful?
- Did private respondent exhaust administrative remedies before seeking judicial intervention?
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)