Facts:

The case involves Nicanora Bernas, Eligia Botor, Juana Botor, and Primo Botor as plaintiffs and appellees against Arcadio M. Bolo as the defendant and appellant, with Maria M. Paz et al. as third-party appellees. The events leading to this case began with the transfer of a parcel of land by its former owner, Lucio Botor, who is now deceased. On December 19, 1929, Lucio Botor sold the land to Arcadio M. Bolo through a private document of sale. However, ten years later, on April 29, 1939, Lucio Botor executed a deed of cession in favor of Simeon B. Paz, which was ratified before a notary public and subsequently registered in the Register of Deeds of Camarines Sur. The lower court rendered a decision on July 14, 1943, in favor of Simeon B. Paz, ruling that the deed of cession was valid due to its registration, while the earlier private sale to Arcadio M. Bolo could not be registered as it was not executed in a public document. Arcadio M. Bolo appealed this decision, arguing that...

Facts:

Parties and Transaction History

• Plaintiffs and Appellees:
• Nicanora Bernas
• Eligia Botor
• Juana Botor
• Primo Botor
• Defendant and Appellant:
• Arcadio M. Bolo
• Third Party Appellees:
• Maria M. Paz et al
• Land in dispute:
• Originally owned by Lucio Botor (now deceased)
• Transferred twice by Lucio Botor:
• First Transfer – Private Document of Sale on December 19, 1929 in favor of Arcadio M. Bolo (non-registered)
• Second Transfer – Deed of Cession on April 29, 1939 in favor of Simeon B. Paz, ratified before a notary public and subsequently registered in the Register of Deeds of Camarines Sur

Relevant Proceedings and Evidence

• Lower Court Decision (July 14, 1943):
• Ruled in favor of Simeon B. Paz based on the registered deed of cession
• Considered the fact that the 1929 private document was not extended in a public document and was not registered
• Evidence of Prior Knowledge and Allegations of Bad Faith:
• Appellant Arcadio M. Bolo argued that Simeon B. Paz acquired the land in bad faith knowing it was already sold to him
• Simeon B. Paz’s cross-complaint (filed on February 24, 1939, in civil case No. 6693) alleged that Lucio Botor had transferred the land to Arcadio M. Bolo
• Letters (Exhibits N and O) from Simeon B. Paz to Arcadio M. Bolo (dated February 23 and 28, 1939) further evidence that Simeon was aware of the earlier transaction
• The disputed transaction involving payment of a debt by Arcadio M. Bolo to Pedro Babilonia, with coconut trees as part of the arrangement, was also highlighted in the evidence

Legal Ground and Transaction Dynamics

• Application of Article 1473 of the Civil Code:
• Provides that if the same thing is sold to different vendees, ownership of real property goes to the purchaser who first records the title provided there is good faith
• If not recorded, it goes to the person who first takes possession in good faith or presents the oldest title in the absence of possession
• Analysis of Good Faith:
• The doctrine of good faith is the cornerstone of preferential rights under Article 1473
• Simeon B. Paz’s actions, including filing the cross-complaint acknowledging a prior transaction, indicate his lack of good faith in acquiring the property

Issue:

Validity of the Deed of Cession in Light of Prior Sale

• Whether the deed of cession executed on April 29, 1939 in favor of Simeon B. Paz is legally valid despite the earlier private sale to Arcadio M. Bolo
• Whether Simeon B. Paz, being aware of the prior sale (as evidenced by his cross-complaint and correspondence), acted in good faith as required by Article 1473 of the Civil Code

Effect of Registration versus Non-registration

• Whether the registration of the deed of cession confers ownership rights over a non-registered private sale executed earlier
• The role of registration in protecting the rights of a purchaser in real property transactions under the Civil Code

Ruling:

• (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

• (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

• (Subscriber-Only)