Facts:

• Leoncio Ho Benluy, a Chinese citizen, filed an application for naturalization in 1951.
• There was no opposition from the government to his application.
• During the hearing, Benluy presented evidence to support his application, including character witnesses.
• One of his witnesses, Atty. Marcial M. Anastacio, mentioned that Benluy had taken part in two electoral campaigns in Bulacan, persuading voters and contributing to the campaign fund of the Liberal Party.
• The representatives of the Solicitor General filed a written opposition to the application due to concerns raised by the witness's statement.
• As a result, the trial court denied Benluy's application for naturalization.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The court affirmed the decision of the trial court, denying Benluy's appli...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The court based its decision on Section 56 of the Revised Election Code, which prohibits foreigners from aiding any candidate or taking part in any election.
• Violation of this provision is considered a serious election offense and is penalized with imprisonment and deportation for foreigners.
• The court emphasized that these provisions were intended to discourage foreigners from interfering with Philippine elections and should not be taken lightly.
• Despite the fact that Benluy was never prosecuted for his violation and that the offense had already prescribed, the court held that the law must be applied and enforced.
• The court noted that it ...continue reading