Title
Benavides vs. Alabastro
Case
G.R. No. L-19762
Decision Date
Dec 23, 1964
A dispute over a judgment leads to a ruling that a decision cannot be made on a motion for judgment on the pleadings when the defendant's answer raises an issue, emphasizing the need for evidence when material allegations are in dispute.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-19762)

Facts:

  • The case is Benavides v. Alabastro, G.R. No. L-19762, decided on December 23, 1964, by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
  • Adolfo B. Benavides (plaintiff-appellee) filed a lawsuit against Eduardo Alabastro (defendant-appellant) in the Court of First Instance of Manila.
  • A judgment from the Municipal Court of Manila on August 26, 1955, ordered Alabastro to pay Ajax International Corporation P274.85, with 12% annual interest from January 25, 1955, plus 20% of the total as attorney's fees.
  • Ajax International Corporation assigned its rights under this judgment to Benavides on January 6, 1961.
  • Benavides notified Alabastro of this assignment on July 24, 1961, demanding payment totaling P438.73 as of June 20, 1961.
  • Alabastro did not make the payment, leading Benavides to file a complaint on January 26, 1962, seeking the owed amount, interest, and attorney's fees.
  • Alabastro denied the allegations and raised affirmative defenses in his response.
  • On March 9, 1962, the trial court granted Benavides' motion for judgment on the pleadings, ordering Alabastro to pay.
  • Alabastro appealed, contending that the court erred by deciding based solely on the pleadings.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Alabastro, reversing the lower court's decision.
  • The Court found that the trial court erred by issuing a judgment based solely on the pleadings, as the defendant's answer raised issues th...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • A judgment on the pleadings is valid only when no issues are raised or when all material allegations are admitted by the opposing party.
  • Alabastro's answer included denials and affirmative defenses, which presented clear issues.
  • The Court referenced Section 10, Rule 8 of the Rules of Court, stating that a denial based on lack of knowledge or information is sufficient to raise an issue.
  • The rul...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.