Case Digest (A.C. No. 258)
Facts:
In the case of Rufina Bautista vs. Atty. Benjamin O. Barrios, the complainant, Rufina Bautista, alleged that Atty. Barrios committed malpractice in his capacity as her attorney. The events leading to the complaint began in August 1955 when Rufina engaged Atty. Barrios to draft an extra-judicial partition of the conjugal properties of Federico Rovero and his deceased wife, Maria Bautista, who was Rufina's sister and had died intestate in 1952. The deed of partition was prepared and signed by the involved parties. However, in September 1955, when Rovero refused to comply with the terms of the partition, Rufina sought Atty. Barrios's representation in a lawsuit (Civil Case No. K-689) against Rovero to enforce the partition. Atty. Barrios, however, refused to represent her, leading Rufina to hire Atty. Artemio S. Arrieta instead. Subsequently, Atty. Barrios appeared as counsel for Rovero, opposing Rufina's claims regarding the partition. In his defense, Atty. Barrios ...
Case Digest (A.C. No. 258)
Facts:
- Engagement of Atty. Barrios: In August 1955, Rufina Bautista engaged the services of Atty. Benjamin O. Barrios to draft an extra-judicial partition. The partition involved the distribution of conjugal properties between Rufina Bautista, her siblings, and Federico Rovero, the widower of Maria Bautista (Rufina’s deceased sister).
- Execution of the Deed: Atty. Barrios prepared the deed of partition, which was signed by the parties.
- Breach of Agreement: In September 1955, Federico Rovero refused to comply with the terms of the partition. Rufina Bautista filed a lawsuit (Civil Case No. K-689) to enforce the partition and sought Atty. Barrios’ representation.
- Refusal to Represent: Atty. Barrios refused to represent Rufina Bautista, forcing her to engage another lawyer, Atty. Artemio S. Arrieta.
- Appearance for the Opposing Party: Atty. Barrios subsequently appeared as counsel for Federico Rovero, opposing Rufina Bautista’s claims under the partition.
- Conflicting Claims: Atty. Barrios claimed that he was engaged by Federico Rovero, not Rufina Bautista, to draft the partition. However, he admitted in his answer to the complaint that he prepared the deed upon the joint request of Federico Rovero, Rufina Bautista, and Francisco Bautista.
Issue:
- Whether Atty. Barrios committed malpractice by refusing to represent Rufina Bautista and instead appearing for Federico Rovero, the opposing party.
- Whether Atty. Barrios violated professional ethics by taking inconsistent positions and raising issues that breached Rufina Bautista’s confidence.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)