Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9185)
Facts:
The case involves Batangas Transportation Company and Laguna Transportation Company, with the latter as the respondent. The decision was rendered on December 27, 1958, by the Public Service Commission, which granted Laguna Transportation Company three additional round trips from Pagsanjan, Laguna to Manila, and another three from Batangas Piers to Manila. The application for these additional trips was opposed by Batangas Transportation Company and Laguna-Tayabas Bus Company. They argued that their existing bus services from Pagsanjan to Manila, as well as from Batangas Piers to Manila, were sufficient to meet the transportation needs of the residents in those areas.
The opposition presented both testimonial and documentary evidence to support their claims, asserting that the current bus services adequately catered to the volume of traffic. However, the Commission found that passengers in Pagsanjan faced difficulties in securing accommodations, as buses from farther municip...
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-9185)
Facts:
- Application for Additional Trips: Laguna Transportation Company (respondent) applied to the Public Service Commission (PSC) for three additional round trips from Pagsanjan, Laguna to Manila and three additional round trips from Batangas Piers to Manila.
- Opposition by Petitioners: Batangas Transportation Company and Laguna-Tayabas Bus Company opposed the application, arguing that their existing services on the Pagsanjan-Manila and Batangas Piers-Manila routes were sufficient to meet passenger demand.
- Evidence Presented by Respondent:
- Passengers at Pagsanjan faced difficulties boarding buses as buses from Sta. Maria, Paete, and other southern points were already full upon reaching Pagsanjan.
- Residents of Pagsanjan desired early morning trips to Manila to conduct business and return the same day.
- Buses from Batangas Piers were insufficient to accommodate passengers arriving from Mindoro.
- Residents of Lobo, Lipa City, Malvar, and San Jose faced challenges boarding buses due to overcrowding.
- Evidence Presented by Petitioners:
- Existing services were adequate, and there was no significant traffic to justify additional trips.
- Petitioners suffered financial losses on the Pagsanjan-Manila and Batangas Piers-Manila routes.
- Respondent allegedly cut trips from Batangas Piers to Manila, operating only up to Batangas poblacion.
- PSC Findings:
- The PSC found that the respondent provided sufficient evidence to justify the need for additional trips.
- The reduction of trips by other operators (e.g., Binan Transportation Company and Maria Ruiz) created a gap in service.
- The PSC noted that the interval between trips on the Batangas Piers-Manila route was 50 minutes, and on the Pagsanjan-Manila route, it was over 10 minutes, indicating room for additional trips.
Issue:
- Whether the PSC erred in disregarding the petitioners' evidence, including:
- Reports from PSC agents showing that buses operated below 50% capacity.
- Petitioners' claims of financial losses.
- Allegations of cut-throat competition among operators.
- Testimony that respondent cut trips from Batangas Piers to Manila.
- Whether the PSC's decision to grant additional trips was supported by sufficient evidence.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)