Case Digest (A.M. No. P-94-1026)
Facts:
- Atty. Damaso Gregorio, the Clerk of Court V in the Regional Trial Court of Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro, was found guilty of negligence and misconduct.
- The case was filed by Victor Basco, the plaintiff in Civil Case No. 1091-92 entitled "Basco v. Mirafles."
- Basco alleged that despite the case being submitted for decision in February 1993, a decision had not yet been promulgated due to the loss of records by respondent Gregorio.
- Basco also claimed that he observed Gregorio to be drunk and tipsy during office hours.
- Respondent Gregorio admitted that he was appointed as Commissioner in the said case but disputed the date of submission for decision.
- Gregorio explained that the delay in the report was due to the loss of the case records, although he claimed that the records were already reconstituted.
- Gregorio denied Basco's allegation of being drunk and tipsy during office hours.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The court found Gregorio guilty of negligence in the safekeeping of court records.
- Gregorio was ordered to pay a fine of P5,000 and was severely admonished to be more circumspect in the performance of his dut...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court emphasized the vital role of a clerk of court in the prompt and proper administration of justice.
- A clerk of court is responsible for keeping records, issuing processes, entering judgments and orders, and providing certified copies from the records.
- Rule 136, Section 7 of the Manual for Clerks of Court mandates the safekeeping of court records and property.
- Gregorio's failure to discharge his d...continue reading
Case Digest (A.M. No. P-94-1026)
Facts:
In the case of Basco v. Gregorio, A.M. No. P-94-1026, decided on July 6, 1995, the respondent, Atty. Damaso Gregorio, served as the Clerk of Court V of the Regional Trial Court of Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro. The complainant, Victor Basco, filed a sworn complaint on January 31, 1994, alleging that despite his civil case being submitted for decision in February 1993, a decision had not yet been promulgated due to the respondent's loss of some or all of the case records. Additionally, the complainant claimed that he observed the respondent to be drunk and tipsy during office hours.
Issue:
The main issues raised in the case are as follows:
- Whether or not the respondent, Atty. Damaso Gregorio, was negligent and committed misconduct in the safekeeping of court records.
- Whether or not the respondent was drunk and tipsy during office hours.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the complainant and found the respondent, Atty. Damaso Gregorio, guilty of...