Case Digest (G.R. No. L-21168)
Facts:
- Gavino Camunayan filed an application for a certificate of public convenience to operate a bus service with the Public Service Commission.
- Bachrach Transportation Co., Inc., a domestic corporation engaged in the same business, objected to the application.
- After the appropriate proceedings, the Commission granted Camunayan the certificate of public convenience to operate a PUB auto-truck service on the line Ilagan (Isabela) Buguey (Cagayan) via Tuguegarao and Aparri, with 15 units.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Public Service Commission to grant Camunayan the certificate of public convenience to operate a bus service.
- The Court held that the findings of fact of administrative bodies, such as the Commission, will not be interfered with by courts unless there is a grave abuse of discretion or lack of substantial evidence.
- Bachrach Transportation Co., Inc. failed to establish the absence of substantial evidence or abuse of discretion.
- The Court also noted that the Commission's conclusions regarding the credibility of witnesses are generally not reviewable.
- The record did not show any error in...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Court's decision was based on the principle that findings of fact of administrative bodies should not be interfered with unless there is a grave abuse of discretion or lack of substantial evidence.
- Bachrach Trans...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-21168)
Facts:
The case of Bachrach Transportation Co., Inc. v. Camunayan involves a dispute over the grant of a certificate of public convenience to Gavino Camunayan to operate a bus service. Camunayan filed an application with the Public Service Commission to operate a bus service on the line Cordon (Isabela) Buguey (Cagayan). Bachrach Transportation Co., Inc., a domestic corporation engaged in the same business, objected to the application. After proceedings, the Commission granted Camunayan the certificate of public convenience. Bachrach Transportation Co., Inc. appealed the decision, arguing that the Commission erred in granting the certificate and in overruling their opposition.
Issue:
The main issue in the case is whether the Commission's decision to grant Camunayan the certificate of public convenience was valid.
Ruling:
The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Commission.
Ratio:
The Court held t...