Facts:

The case involves The Bachrach Motor Co., Inc., the owner and operator of "Rural Transit," as the petitioner, and the Rural Transit Employees' Association and the Court of Industrial Relations as respondents. Pablo Reyes was employed by the Rural Transit as a bus chauffeur but was dismissed from service on May 8, 1948, retroactive to March 23, 1948, when he was suspended. The Rural Transit Employees' Association, of which Reyes was a member, filed a petition with the Court of Industrial Relations to seek his reinstatement and payment of his wages from the time of his suspension. The Court ruled in favor of Reyes, leading the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc. to bring the case to the Supreme Court via certiorari.

Prior to Reyes’ dismissal, on January 20, 1948, an agreement was entered into between the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc. and the Rural Transit Employees’ Association. This agreement stipulated several employment terms, particularly emphasizing that employee dismissals

...

Facts:

Background of the Dispute

• Pablo Reyes, employed as a chauffeur for the Rural Transit, was dismissed effective March 23, 1948, following a suspension that began on that same day.
• The dismissal arose under circumstances involving an accident and alleged violation of operating rules, which led the Rural Transit Employees’ Association to seek his reinstatement and payment of back wages.
• The case was initially handled by the Court of Industrial Relations under the framework of an agreement between the Rural Transit Employees’ Association and the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc. (the owner/operator of Rural Transit).

The Agreement and Its Provisions

• On January 20, 1948, an agreement was entered into by the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc. and the Rural Transit Employees’ Association, setting forth terms and conditions for employment for the year 1948.
• The agreement was submitted to the Court of Industrial Relations (Case No. 142), which subsequently approved it on February 3, 1948, and enjoined the parties to strictly observe its terms as if it were a court decision or award.
• Key provisions relevant to the case:
• Paragraph 11: Required that any employee dismissal or suspension be subject to the approval of the Court of Industrial Relations. Suspension was limited to one week unless the employee was exonerated, in which event his full salary for that period was to be paid, or the dispute escalated to the Court.
• Paragraph 16: Provided that any employee found misappropriating company funds or willfully violating reasonable operational rules would be immediately separated from service.

Facts Surrounding the Accident and Dismissal

• The petitioner (Bachrach Motor Co., Inc.) justified the dismissal under Paragraph 16 by alleging that Pablo Reyes was involved in reckless driving and speeding on March 23, 1948, which led to an accident.
• Specific details of the accident among the evidentiary findings:
• Bus No. 151, driven by Reyes, was involved in an incident where it fell into a ditch after running at speeds between 45 to 50 km/h and later slowing down to 40 to 45 km/h near a culvert between Bascaran and Tuao, Nueva Vizcaya.
• As the bus passed the culvert, a jerk and a cracking noise signaled a malfunction – specifically, breakage of the left front wheel mainsprings – which resulted in loss of steering control.
• Despite the ensuing loss of control, Reyes attempted to avert further harm by applying the brakes, though only slightly, leading the bus to strike an approximately 60-centimeter-deep carabao hole and sustain significant mechanical damage (including a dented front axle, smashed gasoline tank and fuel pump, and additional damage to other parts).
• Findings related to the driver’s conduct:
• Pablo Reyes was one of the experienced prewar drivers recalled after the liberation and had been assigned a new model bus due to his experience.
• Evidence did not support claims that Reyes was under the influence of liquor; instead, findings demonstrated that he exercised reasonable caution and maneuvered appropriately in a challenging situation.
• The court characterized the event as an ordinary highway accident, particularly given the rough road conditions, rather than a case of reckless or negligent behavior.

Issue:

Jurisdiction and Applicability of the Agreement

• Whether the dismissal of Pablo Reyes was justifiable under the terms of the employment agreement entered into by the parties, which was given the effect of a court decision by the Court of Industrial Relations.
• Whether the Court of Industrial Relations had the jurisdiction to hear and decide the case, considering the petitioner’s contention that the matter was a breach of contract and not an industrial dispute.

Grounds for Dismissal

• Whether Pablo Reyes’ conduct on March 23, 1948, particularly in connection with the bus accident, constituted a willful violation of the operational rules (as per Paragraph 16) or if it was an ordinary accident not warranting immediate dismissal.
• Whether the petitioner’s action of dismissing the employee without securing prior approval from the Court of Industrial Relations (as mandated by Paragraph 11) rendered the dismissal procedurally and substantively flawed.

Ruling:

• (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

• (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

• (Subscriber-Only)