Title
Antonio vs. Antonio
Case
G.R. No. 22399
Decision Date
Dec 12, 1924
A will's probate contested due to missing left-margin signatures on the seventh page; Supreme Court ruled signatures at the bottom suffice, admitting the will.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 22399)

Facts:

1. Background of the Case:
This case involves the probate of the will of Laureana Antonio, who passed away. The petitioner, Mariano Antonio, sought to have the will admitted to probate, while opponents Santiago Antonio et al. and Jorge R. Neri et al. contested its validity.

2. The Will in Question:
The will consists of seven pages. The first six pages were executed in compliance with legal requirements. However, the dispute centers on the seventh page, which contains the conclusion of the will and the attestation clause.

3. Execution of the Will:

  • The testator, Laureana Antonio, and the three attesting witnesses signed at the bottom of the seventh page.
  • The attestation clause, also located on the seventh page, was signed by the three witnesses at the bottom.
  • Notably, neither the testator nor the witnesses signed on the left margin of the seventh page.

4. Lower Court Decision:
The lower court denied the probate of the will, ruling that it was not executed with the solemnities required by law, specifically due to the absence of signatures on the left margin of the seventh page.

Issue:

The primary issue in this case is whether the absence of signatures on the left margin of the seventh page of the will constitutes a fatal defect that justifies the denial of its probate.

Ruling:

The Supreme Court reversed the decision of the lower court and admitted the will of Laureana Antonio to probate. The Court held that the absence of signatures on the left margin of the seventh page does not invalidate the will, as the testator and witnesses had signed at the bottom of the page, fulfilling the essential requirements for a valid will.

Ratio:

  1. Legal Solemnities and Authenticity:
    The purpose of the legal requirements for executing a will is to ensure its authenticity. The Court emphasized that the absence of signatures on the left margin does not undermine the authenticity of the will, as the testator and witnesses had signed at the bottom of the page.

  2. Precedent in Abangan vs. Abangan:
    The Court relied on its earlier decision in Abangan vs. Abangan (40 Phil. 476), where a will with similar defects was admitted to probate. In that case, the will lacked signatures on the margins but was signed at the bottom of each page. The Court found no material difference between the two cases and ruled that the absence of marginal signatures is not a fatal defect.

  3. Double Signatures on the Seventh Page:
    The Court noted that in the instant case, the attesting witnesses signed twice on the seventh pageā€”once at the bottom of the will and again at the bottom of the attestation clause. This further reinforced the authenticity of the will.

  4. Liberal Interpretation of Legal Requirements:
    The Court adopted a liberal interpretation of the legal requirements for executing a will, focusing on the substantial compliance with the law rather than strict adherence to formalities.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.