Case Digest (G. R. No. 39385)
Facts:
- The case involves plaintiffs-appellees Ambrosio Alegre et al. and defendants-appellants Andres Javan et al.
- The dispute arose in Negros Occidental, where the plaintiffs filed a case against the defendants in the Court of First Instance.
- The lower court issued an order on September 23, 1932, which was subsequently appealed by the defendants.
- The case was brought before the Supreme Court of the Philippines for review.
- Specific details of the events leading to the lawsuit, including the nature of the dispute and the arguments presented in the lower court, are not provided in the decision summary.
- The plaintiffs sought to recover a sum of money from the defendants, and the lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental dated September 23, 1932.
- The defendants-appellants were ordered to pay the costs in both instances.
- The plaintiffs-appel...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court, after reviewing the records and considering the arguments presented by both parties, found no error in the decision of the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental.
- The affirmation of the lower court's decision indicates that the Supreme Court agreed with the findings and conclusions of the tria...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 39385)
Facts:
The case involves plaintiffs-appellees Ambrosio Alegre et al. and defendants-appellants Andres Javan et al. The dispute arose in Negros Occidental, where the plaintiffs filed a case against the defendants in the Court of First Instance. The lower court issued an order on September 23, 1932, which was subsequently appealed by the defendants. The case was then brought before the Supreme Court of the Philippines for review. The specific details of the events leading to the lawsuit, including the nature of the dispute and the arguments presented in the lower court, are not provided in the decision summary. However, it is clear that the plaintiffs sought to recover a sum of money from the defendants, and the lower court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs.
Issue:
- Did the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental err in its decision dat...