Case Digest (G.R. No. 206042)
Facts:
The case involves Amalgamated Motors Philippines, Inc. (AMPI) as the petitioner and the Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC), Hon. Manuel A. Roxas II, Hon. Joseph Emilio Aguinaldo Abaya, Virginia P. Torres, and Ildefonso T. Patdu, Jr. as respondents. The events leading to this case began on May 24, 2010, when the Land Transportation Office (LTO) published an Invitation to Bid for the Supply and Delivery of Philippine Driver's License Cards. AMPI and Realtime Data Management Services, Inc. (RDMSI) purchased the bidding documents and Terms of Reference (TOR) for P84,000.00. Due to various issues, the LTO-BAC postponed the opening of bid documents, prompting Secretary Jose P. de Jesus to require a comprehensive review of the TOR, which led to its modification and the eventual suspension of the bid opening. Subsequently, a new Invitation to Bid was issued on December 24, 2010, under Special Order No. 2011-181, which created a new Special Bid...
Case Digest (G.R. No. 206042)
Facts:
Background of the Case
Amalgamated Motors Philippines, Inc. (AMPI) participated in a bidding process initiated by the Land Transportation Office (LTO) for the Supply and Delivery of Philippine Driver's License Cards. The LTO published an Invitation to Bid on May 24, 2010, and AMPI purchased the bidding documents and Terms of Reference (TOR) for P84,000.
Issues with the Bidding Process
The bidding process faced complications, prompting the LTO-Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) to defer the opening of bid documents. The Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) Secretary, Jose P. de Jesus, ordered a comprehensive review of the TOR, leading to its modification. The LTO-BAC later suspended the bidding process, and Secretary de Jesus issued Department Order (D.O.) No. 2010-36, creating a Special Bids and Awards Committee (SBAC).
New Invitation to Bid
On December 24, 2010, the DOTC-SBAC posted a new Invitation to Bid. Previous participants, including AMPI, were allowed to obtain new bid documents upon presenting their receipts. However, Realtime Data Management Services, Inc. (RDMSI), another prospective bidder, filed a Petition for Declaratory Relief with a Prayer for Injunction, alleging irregularities in the bidding process.
RTC's Issuance of Preliminary Injunction
The Regional Trial Court (RTC) granted RDMSI's application for a preliminary injunction, halting the bidding process. Secretary de Jesus then issued Special Order (S.O.) No. 2011-181, strengthening the BAC. Despite this, the DOTC posted a new Invitation to Bid in April 2012, leading AMPI to intervene and challenge the validity of D.O. No. 2010-36 and S.O. No. 2011-181.
CA's Reversal of RTC's Decision
The Court of Appeals (CA) reversed the RTC's orders, dissolving the writs of preliminary injunction. The CA ruled that AMPI and RDMSI, as prospective bidders, did not have a clear and unmistakable right to the injunctive writs.
Issue:
The sole issue in this case is whether the CA erred in dissolving the writs of preliminary injunction issued by the RTC.
Ruling:
- (Subscriber-Only)
Ratio:
- (Subscriber-Only)