Title
Alano vs. Court of 1st Instance of Bulacan
Case
G.R. No. L-14557
Decision Date
Oct 30, 1959
Petitioners, declared in default, challenged an alias writ of execution for a foreclosure deficiency. SC upheld the writ, ruling petitioners lacked standing post-default and judgment was final.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14557)

Facts:

Background of the Case

  • Petitioners, Epifanio J. Alano et al., filed a special civil action of certiorari to annul several orders issued by the Court of First Instance of Bulacan in Civil Case No. 694, a foreclosure suit involving a mortgage executed by the petitioners in favor of respondent Miguel Campos.

Foreclosure Proceedings

  • The foreclosure suit proceeded to trial after the petitioners were declared in default for failing to appear and answer the complaint.
  • On January 12, 1953, the court rendered a judgment ordering the petitioners to pay respondent Campos P25,000.00 with stipulated interest, 15% attorney's fees, and costs. The court also ordered the sale of the mortgaged properties at public auction if the petitioners failed to pay.

Auction Sale and Deficiency

  • The petitioners failed to pay, and the mortgaged properties were sold at public auction to respondent Campos for P10,000.00.
  • On July 3, 1953, the court confirmed the auction sale.
  • On August 25, 1953, respondent Campos filed an ex-parte motion for an alias writ of execution, claiming a deficiency of P22,375.21 after applying the auction sale proceeds to the judgment.

Issuance of Alias Writ of Execution

  • On September 7, 1953, the court granted the motion and issued an alias writ of execution directed to the Provincial Sheriff of Rizal.
  • On September 11, 1953, the alias writ was issued.

Motion to Set Aside Alias Writ

  • On June 21, 1958, the petitioners filed a motion to set aside the alias writ, arguing that there was no deficiency judgment and that the court lacked jurisdiction to issue the writ.
  • On August 1, 1958, the court granted the motion and set aside the alias writ.

Reversal of the Order

  • On August 18, 1958, respondent Campos filed a motion for reconsideration, arguing that the court had lost jurisdiction over the case and that the petitioners, having been declared in default, had no standing in court.
  • On September 11, 1958, the court reversed its August 1, 1958 order, reinstating the alias writ.
  • On September 30, 1958, the court denied the petitioners' motion for reconsideration.

Issue:

  1. Whether the respondent court acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction in issuing the alias writ of execution on September 7, 1953.
  2. Whether the respondent court acted with grave abuse of discretion in reversing its August 1, 1958 order and reinstating the alias writ on the ground that the petitioners had no standing in court due to their default.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.