Title
Acaban vs. Ortega
Case
G.R. No. 38515-16
Decision Date
Jun 19, 1982
The Supreme Court dismisses the petition to annul an injunction and compel garnishment as moot due to the finality of the prior judgment.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 38515-16)

Facts:

  • Vicente G. Acaban is the petitioner against Honorable Wenceslao M. Ortega, Presiding Judge of the Court of First Instance (CFI) of Manila, Branch VIII, and B & B Forest Development Corporation as respondents.
  • On January 30, 1970, the CFI of Manila issued a decision in Civil Case No. 75138, ordering B & B and other defendants to pay Acaban P24,910.41, plus interest, P300.00 for cash advanced, P6,300.00 for attorney's fees, and costs of the suit.
  • Acaban filed a motion for garnishment of B & B's bank deposit with China Banking Corporation, leading the court to order the bank to report on any deposits held by B & B.
  • On February 21, 1972, B & B filed a complaint to annul the judgment in Civil Case No. 75138, claiming lack of jurisdiction and denial of due process due to alleged failure to serve summons.
  • The court issued a preliminary injunction restraining Acaban and the Sheriff of Manila from enforcing the writ of execution.
  • After a trial, the court dismissed B & B's complaint on March 6, 1974, affirming the validity of the original judgment.
  • B & B sought to restore the injunction pending appeal, leading to Judge Ortega's order on March 27, 1974, which again restrained the execution of the judgment.
  • Acaban filed a petition for certiorari and mandamus to annul this order and compel the sheriff to proceed with the garnishment.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, stating that the issues raised were rendered moot and academic due to the finality of the judgment in Civil Case No. 86246, w...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court reasoned that the finality of the judgment in Civil Case No. 86246, which dismissed B & B's complaint to annul the earlier judgment in Civil Case No. 75138, made the current petition unnecessary to reso...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.