Title
Aboitiz Shipping Corp. vs. City of Cebu
Case
G.R. No. L-14526
Decision Date
Mar 31, 1965
The case of Aboitiz Shipping Corp. v. City of Cebu determined that the City of Cebu did not have the authority to collect wharfage dues on wharves owned by the National Government, resulting in the nullification of the city's ordinance and a refund of collected amounts.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-14526)

Facts:

  • The case Aboitiz Shipping Corp. vs. City of Cebu (G.R. No. L-14526) was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on March 31, 1965.
  • Plaintiffs-appellants included Aboitiz Shipping Corporation and other shipping companies.
  • Defendants-appellees were the City of Cebu, represented by City Treasurer Felipe Pareja and Mayor Sergio Osmeña, Jr.
  • The controversy arose from Ordinance No. 207, enacted on August 14, 1956, imposing wharfage dues on watercraft using public wharves in Cebu.
  • The wharves in question were owned by the National Government.
  • Shipping companies began paying the wharfage fees under protest starting September 1, 1956.
  • On May 8, 1957, they filed a complaint in the Court of First Instance of Manila to declare the ordinance void, enjoin its enforcement, and seek a refund.
  • The lower court dismissed the complaint, leading to an appeal to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs-appellants.
  • The City of Cebu was found to lack the authority to collect wharfage dues on National Government-owned wharves.
  • Ordinance No. 207 was declared null and voi...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court interpreted "public wharves" as defined in the City of Cebu's charter, clarifying that "public" refers to usage rather than ownership.
  • The right to impose wharfage dues is contingent upon ownership; since the wharves were owned by the National Government, only it had the authority to collect fees.
  • The Court emphasized that the ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.