Title
Abig vs. Constantino
Case
G.R. No. L-12460
Decision Date
May 31, 1961
The Supreme Court emphasized that public officials' decisions based on factual findings are conclusive and judicial review is limited to jurisdictional grounds and grave abuse of discretion in certiorari petitions.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-12460)

Facts:

  • Eusebio Constantino filed a homestead application for a parcel of land in Solana, Cagayan in 1946.
  • Marcos Abig, Honorata Cagumbay, and Lino Pagulayan claimed different portions of the land.
  • The Bureau of Lands conducted an investigation and found that Constantino's application should be given due course.
  • Abig, Cagumbay, and Pagulayan appealed to the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, but their appeal was denied.
  • They filed a petition for certiorari with the Court of First Instance of Cagayan, alleging that the decisions of the Bureau of Lands and the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources were rendered with grave abuse of discretion.
  • The court dismissed their petition, stating that the decisions of the public officials were conclusive and not subject to judicial review.
  • The court also noted that the appellants were in estoppel to attack the decisions, as they had previously agreed to respect and submit to the decisions of the Bureau of Lands and the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
  • The appellants appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The decisions of the public officials are conclusive and not subject to judicial review.
  • A petition for certiorari can only succeed if it is based on jurisdictional grounds, and any error committed by the respondent in the exercise of their jurisdiction can only be reviewed or corrected by appeal.
  • Abuse of discretion is a ground for certiorari, but not every error in the proceeding or every erroneous conclusion of law or fact constitutes abuse of discretion.
  • Errors in the appreciation of evidence cannot be reviewed by certiorari.
  • The decisions of the public officials were based on their discretion and judgm...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • De...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.