Title
Abeja vs. Tanada
Case
G.R. No. 112283
Decision Date
Aug 30, 1994
The court ruled that the respondent's failure to initiate the revision of counter-protested precincts constituted a waiver and upheld the petitioner's laches claim due to the respondent's unreasonable delay in the revision process.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 112283)

Facts:

  • Evelyn Abeja contested the election results against Rosauro Radovan for the position of municipal mayor of Pagbilao, Quezon, following the May 11, 1992 national elections.
  • Radovan was proclaimed the winner with 6,215 votes, while Abeja received 5,951 votes.
  • Abeja filed an election contest (Election Case No. 92-1) challenging results in 22 precincts, while Radovan counter-protested 36 precincts.
  • During pre-trial, Radovan's counsel requested that the revision of counter-protested precincts occur only if Abeja led by at least one vote after revising the 22 precincts.
  • The trial court deemed this request premature.
  • By September 1992, the revision of the 22 precincts was completed, but Radovan did not initiate the revision of his counter-protest.
  • Abeja moved to have Radovan's counter-protest considered withdrawn due to his inaction, which Radovan opposed.
  • In April 1993, all pending matters were submitted for resolution without Radovan revising the counter-protested precincts.
  • Radovan died on June 13, 1993, and was substituted by Vice-Mayor Conrado de Rama and his widow, Ediltrudes Radovan.
  • On August 27, 1993, Abeja filed a motion to determine the votes and declare her the winner, claiming a lead of 281 votes.
  • Judge Tanada denied this motion on September 21, 1993, ruling it premature until the counter-protested precincts were revised.
  • A motion for reconsideration was denied on October 18, 1993, leading Abeja to file a petition for certiorari on November 8, 1993.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that the revision of the 36 counter-protested precincts should not proceed, as Radovan had effectively abandoned his counter-protest.
  • The Court found that the respondent judge erred in denying the petitioner's motion to determine the vote...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court held that Radovan abandoned his counter-protest by failing to pursue the revision of the 36 precincts after the completion of the 22 precincts.
  • The Court emphasized that the Comelec Rules of Procedure dictate a specific order for presenting evidence in election contests, which Radovan did not follow.
  • Radovan's insistence that the counter-protest should only b...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.